Results 24 entries found

Saturday, July 3, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

XML error in Log entry

Monday, July 5, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

XML error in Log entry

Tuesday, July 6, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

XML error in Log entry

Wednesday, July 7, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

XML error in Log entry

Thursday, July 8, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

XML error in Log entry

Friday, July 9, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

XML error in Log entry

Saturday, July 10, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

XML error in Log entry

Monday, July 12, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

XML error in Log entry

Tuesday, July 13, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Supreme Court sustains Lincoln's motion and dismisses Maus v. Worthing for use of McCann appeal.4 Ill. 26.

Court allows supersedeas in England v. Clark. Plaintiff in error is ordered to execute $100 bond with William G. Greene, Levi Summers, and Joseph England as security. In Sangamon County Circuit Court case, Campbell & Dabney v. Spear, Lincoln files bill of complaint.Record.

Wednesday, July 14, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Lincoln writes petition for S. T. Logan in Logan v. Payne, Sangamon County Circuit Court case, signing his partner's name. Lindoln writes and signs bill in chancery in Barret v. Fulton et al.Herndon-Weik Collection, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.

Friday, July 16, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

People ex rel. Duncan v. Compton, sheriff of Coles County, and People ex rel. Duncan v. Thorn, sheriff of Lawrence County, are called by Supreme Court. Logan & Lincoln appear for defendant in first and Lincoln alone in second case. On motion of Brown, attorney for plaintiff, defendants are ruled to return fee bill and executions for costs within 20 days.Record.

In Sangamon Circuit Court cases, Lincoln writes agreements between his client Rhoda Hart and defendants in three cases, Hart v. Penny & Harrison, Hart v. McElwain & Mosteller, and Hart v. Harrison & Houghton, dismissing all charges. He writes papers in three other cases: declaration in Simpson v. Stockton; narration in Porter & Durham for use of Durham v. Bradley & Brenholts; bill in chancery in Lewis v. Elkin et al.Herndon-Weik Collection, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.

Lincoln buys $1.75 worth of merchandise from a Springfield merchant.Account (copy), 16 July 1841, Irwin & Corneau Account Book, 252, microfilm, IHi, Springfield, IL.

Saturday, July 17, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Lincoln orders Sheriff Elkin to stay collection of judgment for $196.22 he obtained for plaintiff in Stafford v. Whitney & Whitney March 26, 1841.Sangamon County, Execution Docket D.

Monday, July 19, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Holdridge v. Bayley, appeal from LaSalle County, is continued by consent of parties.Record.

[In Illinois Reports, 5, 124-26, Logan alone is listed as attorney for appellant. This is error as Lincoln aided in argument of appellant's case.]

Tuesday, July 20, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

["Since his return from the circuit," says AltonTelegraph, "Lincoln declines being considered as a candidate for Governor."]

Wednesday, July 21, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

The Illinois Supreme Court appoints attorneys Abraham Lincoln and Albert T. Bledsoe to serve as "examiners" for Benjamin F. James, who wishes to practice law in Illinois. The Court notes that James, of Tazewell County, "presented . . . satisfactory evidence of his good moral character." James passes Lincoln and Bledsoe's examination, and the Court deems that James possesses the "fitness and capacity" to gain admission into the Illinois bar. Order, 21 July 1841, Opinion Record & Journal SC CGD 1840-1841, 468, Illinois Supreme Court, Illinois State Archives, Springfield, IL.

Thursday, July 22, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

In Maus v. Worthing for use of McCann, Logan moves court for supersedeas, case to stand for argument tomorrow.Record.

Friday, July 23, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Logan argues motion for supersedeas in Maus v. Worthing for use of McCann, appeal from Tazewell. Lincoln appears for appellee in this case and in Dow v. Averill and Lowell. Latter case is continued for want of return to summons issued. Bailey v. Cromwell & McNaghton is argued by Lincoln for plaintiff and Logan for defendant.Record.

Saturday, July 24, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Supersedeas is allowed in Maus v. Worthing for use of McCann. Lincoln enters his appearance for defendant in error and moves court for writ of certiorari. After argument, writ is granted.Record.

Monday, July 26, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Lincoln and Campbell represent plaintiff in three cases on opening day of summer term, Sangamon Circuit Court. All three cases, Hart v. McElwain & Mosteller, Hart v. Penny & Harrison, and Hart v. Harrison & Houghton are dismissed at plaintiff's costs.Record.

Lincoln writes plea in People v. Nichols et al., in which Logan & Lincoln are for defendants.Photocopy.

Tuesday, July 27, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Logan and Lincoln have four cases, in all of which they represent plaintiff. On their motion, Allen v. Camp & DeReimer and Chamberlin v. Francis & Sanford, & Vaughn are continued. VanBergen v. Ball & Long, and Peter v. Brinsley et al. they win by default.Record.

Wednesday, July 28, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

In circuit court appeal case of Allen & Co. v. Hunter and Jordan, judgment of lower court is affirmed. Logan & Lincoln represent appellant. They win Hurt v. Carman, Ruckle & Co., and Hay v. Bryan, when defendants default. Lincoln alone represents plaintiff in Edmunds v. Simpson et al., trespass suit. Jury finds for defendants.Record.

In Vaughn, Sanford & Co. v. Hill, Lincoln writes Hill's account with plaintiffs, and also notice that account will be used in evidence. In Briggs v. Uhler he writes answer to plea, general replication, and rejoinder. Herndon-Weik Collection, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.

Thursday, July 29, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

In Circuit Court, Logan & Lincoln, representing plaintiffs, win five suits by default, obtaining total of $965.45 in debt and damages. In Martin v. Tinsley et al. Lincoln writes plea and notice that defendant will try to prove his accounts.Record; Herndon-Weik Collection, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.

Lincoln is invited to address Springfield Mechanics Union in evening though no record of his address can be found.Minutes of Union, 8 July 1841.

Friday, July 30, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Logan and Lincoln have four cases in Circuit Court, in each of which they represent plaintiff. Lewis v. Elkin et al. is continued by agreement; Porter & Durham for use of Durham v. Bradley & Brenholts is dismissed by plaintiff. In Warne v. Thayer et al., bill of discovery is filed by defendants and case continued. Jury awards plaintiff $153.27 in Briggs v. Uhler.Record.

Lincoln fills out several printed subpoena forms in Martin v. Tinsley et al.Herndon-Weik Collection, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.

Saturday, July 31, 1841.+-

Springfield, IL.

Lincoln is engaged with Logan & Lincoln's paper work. He fills out another subpoena in Martin v. Tinsley et al. He writes plea and agreement on evidence in Mallory v. Elkin, and writes and files supersedeas bond ($100) of George and Joseph England as ordered by Supreme Court July 13, 1841, in England v. Clark.Herndon-Weik Collection, Library of Congress, Washington, DC; Photocopy.

[Sangamon Circuit Court does not meet today or Monday.]